Clinical Trial Report Summary Coronary Cutting Balloon Dilatation Catheter
Clinical Trial Report Summary
Coronary Cutting Balloon Dilatation Catheter
🔬 Report Overview
Sponsor: Shunmei Medical Co., Ltd.
Report No.: SM-VBC-CSR20251025
Report Version: V1.0 (November 02, 2025)
Lead Institution: TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital
Coordinating Investigator: Jing Rui
Statistical Unit: CCRF (Suzhou) Inc.
📅 Trial Timeline
Started: June 12, 2025 (first subject enrolled)
Ended: August 20, 2025 (last subject completed)
Duration: ~2.5 months
👥 Participants
Screened: 183 subjects
Enrolled (Randomized): 168 subjects
Treatment Group: 84 subjects
Control Group: 84 subjects
🎯 Study Design & Objectives
Design: Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Primary Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Shunmei Medical's Coronary Cutting Balloon Dilatation Catheter in treating coronary artery disease.
Control Device: Boston Scientific's "Wolverine" Coronary Cutting Balloon (NMPA Device (I): 20203030164)
Primary Endpoint: Device Success Rate (non-inferiority margin: -10%)
Follow-up Points: Immediately post-procedure, before discharge, and 30 days post-procedure.
📊 Key Efficacy Results
🎯 Primary Endpoint: Device Success Rate
Treatment Group
(Shunmei Medical)
97.62%
(82/84 subjects)
Control Group
(Boston Scientific)
96.39%
(80/83 subjects)
Statistical Conclusion (FAS): The 95% CI for the difference in success rates was [-3.94%, 6.41%]. Since the lower limit (-3.94%) > non-inferiority margin (-10%), non-inferiority was achieved.
📈 Secondary Efficacy Endpoints:
- Procedural Success Rate: 100% in both groups
- Target Lesion Failure (TLF): 0% at all time points in both groups
-
Patient-Oriented Composite Endpoint (POCE):
- Immediately post-procedure & before discharge: 0% in both groups
- At 1-month follow-up: 2.38% (2/84) in treatment group vs. 0% in control group (P>0.05, not statistically significant)
🛡️ Safety Results
Adverse Events (AEs)
Treatment Group: 32.14%
Control Group: 34.52%
No statistically significant difference (P>0.05)
Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Treatment Group: 3.57%
Control Group: 2.38%
No statistically significant difference (P>0.05)
Device Defects
0%
No device defects occurred in either group
Key Safety Notes: No serious adverse events related to the investigational device (grades 3-5) occurred. No adverse events led to participant withdrawal from the trial.
✅ Conclusion
This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial demonstrated that Shunmei Medical's Coronary Cutting Balloon Dilatation Catheter is non-inferior in efficacy and comparable in safety to a leading U.S. brand of coronary cutting balloon in patients with coronary artery disease.
The trial met its primary endpoint with a device success rate of 97.62% vs. 96.39% (control), satisfying the non-inferiority hypothesis. Both groups showed 100% procedural success, no TLF events, and similar safety profiles with no device-related serious adverse events.
The clinical trial successfully validates the safety and efficacy of Shunmei Medical's Coronary Cutting Balloon Dilatation Catheter for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
Shunmei Medical Co., Ltd.
Clinical Trial Report Summary | V1.0 | November 02, 2025
