Summary Report of Clinical Trial for Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy ShockFast System

Summary Report of Clinical Trial for Peripheral Intravascular Shockwave System

Summary Report of Clinical Trial for Peripheral
ShockFast-IVL System

Version V1.0 July 15, 2025 Sponsor: Shenzhen Shunmei Medical Co., Ltd. Lead Investigator: TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital / Xuedong Li
Trial Period: June 14, 2024 – June 11, 2025 Sample Size: 120 Cases (Test Group: 62 / Control Group: 58)

Trial Design

Design Type: Prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled, superiority trial
Primary Endpoint: Technical Success Rate
Follow-up Period: Immediately post-procedure, pre-discharge, 30 days (±7 days) post-procedure
Statistical Unit: Peking University Clinical Research Institute

Definition of Primary Endpoints

Technical Success Rate (TSR)
Defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection after device use.
Primary Patency Rate (PPR)
Proportion without restenosis or clinically-driven revascularization within 30 days post-procedure.
Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI)
Ankle pressure/brachial pressure at 30 days post-procedure; improvement calculated as post-procedure minus pre-procedure.
Rutherford Classification
Severity classification based on symptoms; proportion with improvement from baseline at 30 days post-procedure.

Efficacy Results

Primary Endpoint: Technical Success Rate

Group Technical Success Rate
Test Group (n=62) 96.77% (60/62) 95% CI [88.83%, 99.61%]
Control Group (n=58) 68.97% (40/58) 95% CI [55.46%, 80.46%]
The difference between groups is statistically significant (P<0.05) Superiority Established

The 95% confidence interval for the difference in technical success rates is [13.87%, 41.43%], with the lower limit greater than the superiority margin of 0.

27.80%
Absolute Superiority Difference
2.85
Relative Risk Ratio
95% CI
[13.87%, 41.43%]

Secondary Endpoints

Endpoint Test Group (n=62) Control Group (n=58) Intergroup Difference P-value
Primary Patency Rate 70.18% 77.36% P=0.393
ABI Improvement 0.45 ± 0.38 0.43 ± 0.26 P=0.783
Rutherford Classification Improvement 73.68% 79.25% P=0.734

All secondary endpoints showed no statistically significant difference between groups (P>0.05)

96.77%
Test Group TSR
68.97%
Control Group TSR
27.8%
Superiority Difference

Safety Results

Safety Metric Test Group (n=62) Control Group (n=58)
Intraoperative Complications 0 cases (0.00%) 0 cases (0.00%)
Serious Adverse Events 7 events (11.29%) 6 events (10.34%)
Device Deficiencies 0 cases (0.00%) 0 cases (0.00%)
AE Incidence Rate 35.48% 46.55%
0.00%
Intraoperative Complications
35.48%
Test Group AE Rate
46.55%
Control Group AE Rate

Study Conclusion

The peripheral ShockFast-IVL system demonstrated significant superiority over the control device in the primary endpoint of technical success rate (96.77% vs 68.97%, P<0.05), establishing superiority. Secondary endpoints showed no statistical differences. Safety evaluation indicated no additional risks associated with the test device, with no device deficiencies reported.

The device demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety in treating moderate-to-severe calcified lesions in femoropopliteal arteries.

— Conclusion of Clinical Trial Summary Report